Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/8685
Title: Poverty and livelihood strategies of female-headed households in rural Ethiopia: the case of Libo Kemkem Woreda, South Gondar
Researcher: Mossa Endris Ahmed
Guide(s): Vijay Prakash, P
Ramana, G V
Keywords: Anthropology
Poverty
rural Ethiopia
Upload Date: 13-May-2013
University: Andhra University
Completed Date: 2013
Abstract: Female-headed households vulnerability to poverty and their frequency has increased over time in Ethiopia. Female-headed households have shared the great parts of the poverty stricken segments of the society in the rural parts of the country where majority population and in depth poverty found. This study examines vulnerability to poverty and livelihood strategies of female-headed households in rural Libo Kemkem Woreda, South Gondar Administrative Zone of Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. Secondary and primary data were used for the analysis of the social processes. The empirical research employed using both qualitative and quantitative data in addressing the basic research questions through participant observation, individual interviews, life history, focus group discussion and household survey. Besides descriptive statistics, this study used probit model and independent T-test analysis. Qualitative as well as quantitative findings show that female-headed households suffer from access to and control over basic productive agricultural resources such as farmland, labor, livestock (oxen), capital and other extension services compared to male-headed households. Though the land owning pattern between the male-headed households (0.907 ha.) and female-headed households (0.888 ha.) does not show much variation, the other inputs like male adult children, oxen, cultural taboo are critical in drifting the female-headed households to poverty stricken vulnerability.The probit model result shows that the dummy variables of head of household sex and sources of credit have effect of vulnerability and significant at a significant level of 0.01 and 0.05 respectively. As far as the continuous variables that proposed to affect vulnerability are concerned, age household head (0.1), size of owned land (0.01), and livestock holding in TLU (0.01) have effect on vulnerability.
Pagination: xix, 346p.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/8685
Appears in Departments:Department of Anthropology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File122.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_declaration.pdf116.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_certificate.pdf194.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_contents.pdf266.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_acknowledgements.pdf194.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_abstract.pdf175.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_list of tables.pdf226.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_list of figures.pdf126.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_list of acronyms.pdf232.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_list of grossary.pdf223.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_list of publications.pdf195.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 1.pdf736.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 2.pdf417.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 3.pdf472.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 4.pdf336.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_chapter 5.pdf1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_chapter 6.pdf291.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_chapter 7.pdf377.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
19_chapter 8.pdf548.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
20_chapter 9.pdf325.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
21_bibliography.pdf389.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
22_appendix.pdf2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: