Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/582630
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatial
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T12:31:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-13T12:31:08Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/582630-
dc.description.abstractThe biomedical field has made substantial use of synthetic polymers. Implants, vascular grafts, injectable drug delivery and imaging systems, various devices such implanted drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, etc. are all included in the range of applications. The selection of a polymer is based on a number of criteria, including processing simplicity, wear-and-tear properties, mechanical properties, tissue adhesion, inertness in biological environments, etc. One such polymer i.e., Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is being researched extensively for possible application as dental implant material as an alternative to titanium and zirconium dioxide due to their drawbacks such as stress shielding , grey colour, hypersensitivity, high plaque affinity, peri-implantitis, corrosion for titanium dental implants and brittleness, product aging which causes low temperature degradation, degradation of the mechanical properties reducing strength, density, toughness and lesser long term clinical studies for zirconia dental implants. newlineThe most important characteristics which has attracted the researchers towards PEEK is its elastic modulus, being 3-4 GPa, converging with natural osseous matter. Given the unwanted stress shielding phenomena, this characteristic is actually preferable over titanium and zirconia dental implants. PEEK also has other benefits such as aesthetic colour, the ability to be mixed with other materials, radiolucency, which reduces artifacts in MRI and CT scans, and biocompatibility. newlineHowever, the disadvantage of PEEK is, its bioinertness, due to its low surface free energy and it does not have ingrained osteoconductive properties. It exhibits inferior bioactivity due to its predominant chemical stability. Hence, due to low cell adhesion and protein adsorption, there is inadequate bone to implant interactivity. So, surface modification of PEEK needs to be carried out for satisfactory outcomes in terms of osseointegration.
dc.format.extentAll Pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation
dc.rightsuniversity
dc.titleEvaluation of Surface characteristics and Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone Modified with Different Surface Treatments and its Co Relation to Immediate and Early and Delayed Implant Loading Protocols
dc.title.alternative
dc.creator.researcherPatil, Seema Shivajirao
dc.subject.keywordClinical Pre Clinical and Health
dc.subject.keywordProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge
dc.description.note
dc.contributor.guideGandhi, Paresh
dc.publisher.placePune
dc.publisher.universityBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University
dc.publisher.institutionFaculty of Dentistry
dc.date.registered2015
dc.date.completed2024
dc.date.awarded2024
dc.format.dimensions
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNone
dc.source.universityUniversity
dc.type.degreePh.D.
Appears in Departments:Faculty of Dentistry

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
02_prelim pages.pdf.pdfAttached File2.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_contents.pdf.pdf36.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_abstract.pdf.pdf25.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_chapter 1.pdf.pdf470.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_chapter 2.pdf.pdf328.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_chapter 3.pdf.pdf534.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter 4.pdf.pdf2.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter 5.pdf.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 6.pdf.pdf752.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 7.pdf.pdf459.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 8.pdf.pdf338.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_annexures.pdf3.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
80_recommendation.pdf447.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: