Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/403952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatial
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T08:49:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-08T08:49:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/403952-
dc.description.abstractRevenue Non-Equivalence in Multidimensional Procurement Auctions under newlineAsymmetry. We show by an example that the Revenue Equivalence in the Scoring newlineAuctions, as postulated by Che, no longer holds when the suppliers are asymmetric in their newlinecosts of production. newlineCorruption in Multidimensional Procurement Auctions under Asymmetry. We newlineexamine corruption in first- and second-score procurement auctions in an asymmetric bidder newlinesetting. We assume that the auction is delegated to an agent who possesses more information newlineabout quality than the procurer and is known to be corrupt with some probability. Using newlinethis information asymmetry, the corrupt agent asks for a bribe from one of two bidders newlineand promises to manipulate bids in return. We show that the agent approaches the weaker newlinefirm for higher levels of bidder asymmetry in both the auction formats. Our numerical newlinesimulations suggest that the buyer prefers the first-score auction when the stronger firm is newlineapproached by the agent in the second-score auction. If the weaker firm is favored on the newlineother hand, the buyer switches to the second-score auction if the probability of corruption newlineis high. Finally, our paper highlights the limited manipulation power of the agent in the newlinesecond-score auction. newlineModified Right of First Refusal and Endogenous Participation in Procurement newlineAuctions. We examine Right-of-First-Refusal(RoFR) in a procurement auction with newlineendogenous entry when potential suppliers face heterogeneous costs of participation. We newlineshow that granting RoFR to the firm facing a lower cost of participation generates a higher newlineexpected utility to the buyer than when there is no favouritism. Additionally, we propose newlinea modified version of the RoFR clause and show that in comparison to its parent form, the newlinerevised rule generates a higher expected utility to the buyer and provides better odds of newlinethe contract newline
dc.format.extentx, 129p
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation
dc.rightsuniversity
dc.titleEssays on procurement auctions
dc.title.alternative
dc.creator.researcherChandel, Shivangi
dc.subject.keywordEconomics
dc.subject.keywordEconomics and Business
dc.subject.keywordSocial Sciences
dc.description.note
dc.contributor.guideSarkar, Shubhro
dc.publisher.placeMumbai
dc.publisher.universityIndira Gandhi Institute of Development Research
dc.publisher.institutionIndira Gandhi Institute of Development Research
dc.date.registered
dc.date.completed2019
dc.date.awarded
dc.format.dimensions
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNone
dc.source.universityUniversity
dc.type.degreePh.D.
Appears in Departments:Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File25.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_acknowledgement.pdf77.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_contents.pdf58.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_list_of_tables_and_figures.pdf169.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_abstract.pdf91.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter1.pdf358.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter2.pdf311.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter3.pdf2.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_bibliography.pdf87.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
80_recommendation.pdf434.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: