Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/392666
Title: Impact of Universal Declaration of Human Rights on Indian Judiciary with Special Reference to Fundamental Rights
Researcher: Bembalge Sarita Mahadev
Guide(s): Meer Basharat Ali
Keywords: Law
Social Sciences
Social Sciences General
University: Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University
Completed Date: 2022
Abstract: Human rights are those that individuals have by virtue of their existence as newlinehuman beings. The right to life itself and the basic necessities of food and newlineclothing may be considered fundamental human rights. Human rights are not newlinecreated by any legislation, they assume the position of natural rights recognized newlineby all mankind. The law does not establish human rights, as they are inherent newlineentitlements which accrue to every person by virtue of his or her birth into newlinehumanity. The Universal Declaration is a fundamental constitutive document of newlinethe United Nations. The Guinness Book of Records describes the UDHR as the newline Most Translated Document in the world. Even though it is not legally binding, newlinethe Declaration has been adopted in or has influenced various national newlineconstitutions since 1948. It has also served as the foundation for a growing newlinenumber of national laws, international laws, and treaties, as well as regional, newlinenational and sub-national institutions protecting and promoting human rights. newlineThe framers of the Indian Constitution were inspired by the ideals of newlineinternational peace and respect of human rights as embodied in the U.N. Charter newlineand the Universal Declaration. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was newlineadopted by the U.N. General Assembly on December 10, 1948, while debates in newlinethe Indian Constitution Assembly were going on. Hence, it must be assumed newlinethat the makers of the Indian Constitution, in framing Part III on the newlineFundamental Rights, were influenced by the provisions of the Universal newlineDeclaration. It is, therefore, legitimate for the Court to refer to the comparable newlineprovisions of the Universal Declaration in construing the intent and scope of the newlinerelevant text of Part III of the Constitution. Juristically, no individual right can newlinebe absolute. Human rights are rights available against the State. There must, newlinetherefore, be cases of conflict between the interests of the individual and of the newlineState. Hence, a guarantee of human rights must necessarily contain the newlinelimitations or exceptions; the guarantee of
Pagination: 365p
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/392666
Appears in Departments:Department of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File139.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf11.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_abstract.pdf62.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_declaration.pdf11.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_acknowledgement.pdf17.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_contents.pdf161.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_tables.pdf12.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_acronyms.pdf29.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_preface.pdf26.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter1.pdf353.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter2.pdf387.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter3.pdf391.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter4.pdf228.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter5.pdf243.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter6.pdf192.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_conclusion.pdf147.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_summary.pdf46.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_bibiography.pdf90.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
19_caselows.pdf37.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
80_recommendation.pdf323.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: