Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3683
Title: Economic growth, income inequality and public policy in India
Researcher: Pooja
Guide(s): Singh, Lakhwinder
Keywords: Inequality and Growth
Economics
Poverty
Upload Date: 24-Apr-2012
University: Punjabi University
Completed Date: June 2011
Abstract: The main objective of the present study is to re-examine the links among Economic Growth, Income Inequality and Poverty across fourteen major and most populous States. Major tools and techniques used in analysis include Gini Coefficient, Theil Entropy Index, Atkinson Index, Decomposition of Gini, Atkinson and Theil index by Population subgroups, Test of Convergence, β Test of Convergence, Augmented Dicky Fuller Unit Root Test, Granger Causality Test, Cross Section Time Series Regression with panel corrected Standard Errors, Test of U hypothesis, Panel Regression- between effects model etc. The period of study used in thesis is post reform period (1993-05) and constructed, according to the quinquennial rounds of consumption expenditure survey of NSSO. Our results indicate that the extent of inter state inequality across major states was low but increasing, as inferred by each measure of inequality used, with few exception. Also, the extent of inter state income inequality turns out to be more by using per capita data instead of aggregate data. By applying beta test for convergence across fourteen major Indian states, the results point to the fact that there is absolutely no sign of β convergenc. States are in fact diverging with respect to their per capita state product. The results, pertaining to growth interdependence among the states, point to the fact that the linkages between states economies are not generally ‘growth transmitting’ From the detailed analysis of inter state consumption inequality, we conclude that the level of inequality is higher in consumption of non- food items than that of food items. By decomposing the inequalities at all India level, we reached the conclusion that, contribution of within-state component has been quite high (approximately 90 percent) in comparison to the between-state inequality. The results regarding effectiveness of policies in raising the level of growth points to the fact that out of six, only three policies have remained effective in raising the level of growth. There is high need to get the effective implementation of public policy to solve the problems of poverty and inequality and to see why people at the grass root level are still suffering.
Pagination: 307p.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3683
Appears in Departments:Department of Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File135.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf135.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_declaration.pdf135.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_acknowledgements.pdf141.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_contents.pdf159.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_list of tables.pdf27.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_list of figures.pdf28.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter 1.pdf54.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter 2.pdf126.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 3.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 4.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 5.pdf848.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 6.pdf392.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 7.pdf158.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 8.pdf78.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_bibliography.pdf112.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_appendices.pdf326.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_abstract.pdf71.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: