Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/330054
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatial
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T05:32:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-02T05:32:28Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/330054-
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, flaws in the existing fuzzy CCR DEA model as well as in some of the existing methods for solving fuzzy CCR DEA model are pointed out. Also, to resolve the flaws new fuzzy CCR DEA model and new approaches for solving it are proposed. 1.2 Organization of the thesis The chapter wise summary of the thesis is as follows: Chapter 2 Hatami-Marbini et al. [40] proposed a method to solve fuzzy CCR DEA model for evaluating the best relative fuzzy efficiency of decision making units (DMUs). In this chapter, it is pointed that the product of fuzzy numbers, used by Hatami-Marbini et al. [40], in their proposed method, is incorrect and hence, the method, proposed by Hatami-Marbini et al. [40], is not valid. To resolve this flaw, the method proposed by Hatami Marbini et al. [40], is modified by using correct product of fuzzy numbers. Chapter 3 Wang et al. [106] replaced the crisp output data and crisp input data of the crisp CCR DEA model with fuzzy data and proposed two methods for solving this fuzzy CCR DEA model. In this chapter, it is pointed out that the fuzzy CCR DEA model, proposed by Wang et al.[106], is not valid and hence the methods, proposed by Wang et al. [106] for evaluating the fuzzy efficiency of DMUs, are also not valid. Also, a new fuzzy CCR DEA model as well as a method to solve this fuzzy CCR DEA model is proposed. Chapter 4 Wang and Chin [105] proposed an optimistic as well as pessimistic fuzzy CCR DEA model and an approach for solving it to evaluate the best relative fuzzy efficiency as well as worst relative fuzzy efficiency and hence, relative geometric crisp efficiency of DMUs. In this chapter, it is shown that the fuzzy CCR models, proposed by Wang and Chin [105], are ii not valid and hence cannot be used to evaluate the best relative fuzzy efficiency as well as worst relative fuzzy efficiency and hence, relative geometric crisp efficiency of DMUs. To resolve the flaws of the fuzzy CCR DEA model, proposed by Wang and Chin [105], new fuzzy CCR DEA models are proposed.
dc.format.extent207p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation
dc.rightsuniversity
dc.titleSome Approaches for Solving Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Models
dc.title.alternative
dc.creator.researcherBhardwaj, Bindu
dc.subject.keywordData Envelopment Analysis
dc.subject.keywordFuzzy Numbers
dc.subject.keywordManagement
dc.description.note
dc.contributor.guideKumar, Amit
dc.publisher.placePatiala
dc.publisher.universityThapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
dc.publisher.institutionL. M. Thapar School of Management
dc.date.registered
dc.date.completed2015
dc.date.awarded
dc.format.dimensions
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNone
dc.source.universityUniversity
dc.type.degreePh.D.
Appears in Departments:L. M. Thapar School of Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File14.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf422.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_declaration.pdf303.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_dedication.pdf6.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_acknowledgements.pdf443.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_abstract.pdf13.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_list of research papers.pdf78.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_table of contents.pdf20.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter 1.pdf364.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 2.pdf581.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 3.pdf588.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 4.pdf671.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 5.pdf809.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 6.pdf98.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_bibliography.pdf218.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
80_recommendation.pdf112.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: