Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10603/293755
Title: | Qos aware resource scheduling and evaluation of heuristics for processing big data on cloud |
Researcher: | Vaghela, K. N. |
Guide(s): | Lathigara, A. M. |
Keywords: | Average Resource Utilization (ARU) Best Fit (BF) Computer Science Computer Science Theory and Methods Engineering and Technology First Fit (FF) Scheduling Heuristic Service Level Agreement (SLA) Success Rate of Jobs (SR) Total Completion Time (TCT) |
University: | RK University |
Completed Date: | 23/07/2020 |
Abstract: | Results and Discussion: In this research, we have simulated First Fit and Best Fit heuristics with various SLAs like Hard SLA, Best Effort SLA, and Soft SLA. Jobs with required QoS parameters like Reliability, Execution Time and Priority are assigned to the best-matched resource according to heuristic and SLA. Quality of resource is determined by parameters like Reliability, Job Completion Time and the Cost of the resource. Performances of both the heuristic approaches are evaluated with performance parameters like Average Resource Utilization (ARU), Success Rate of Jobs (SR) and Total Completion Time (TCT). newline newlineConclusions: Best Fit heuristic will perform slightly better than the First Fit for ARU and SR. But First Fit will perform better for TCT in all simulation environments due to the early allocation of resources. The highest number of jobs will get scheduled in Soft SLA due to the weakest restrain and Lowest in the case of Hard SLA due to the hardest restrain which will cause an increase in ARU, SR while the decrease in TCT. So, Soft SLA will perform better for both heuristics and in all simulation environments but Job will have to compromise the most in Soft SLA while Hard SLA will not perform that much good compare to Soft SLA as far as the number of jobs which will get scheduled is concerned. But in Hard SLA jobs will have to do the lowest compromise for their QoS requirements. Performance of Best Effort SLA is in between Hard SLA and Soft SLA for both the heuristics. This research work is useful for various organizations that provide various Cloud services to users who seek different levels of QoS for various applications. newline newline |
Pagination: | - |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10603/293755 |
Appears in Departments: | Faculty of Technology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
01_cover page.pdf | Attached File | 131.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
02_certificate.pdf | 140.32 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
03_declaration.pdf | 144.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
04_acknowledgement.pdf | 149.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
05_table of contents.pdf | 115.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
06_list of tables.pdf | 113.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
07_list of figures.pdf | 115.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
08_ list of abbreviations.pdf | 118.73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
09_abstract.pdf | 119.38 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
10_graphical abstract.pdf | 126.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
11_chapter 1.pdf | 592.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
12_chapter 2.pdf | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
13_chapter 3.pdf | 335.65 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
14_chapter 4.pdf | 1.46 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
15_chapter 5.pdf | 195.11 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
16_list of publication.pdf | 113.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
17_references.pdf | 176.08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
18_appendix.pdf | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
80_recommendation.pdf | 332.98 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Altmetric Badge: