Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/237226
Title: Trigger Point Dry Needling And Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation In Non Traumatic Shoulder Pain Disorders A Randomized Clinical Trial
Researcher: Sukumar S
Guide(s): Lawrence J Mathias
Keywords: Clinical Pre Clinical and Health,Clinical Medicine,Orthopedics bones
University: Nitte University
Completed Date: 2018
Abstract: Background: Non-traumatic Shoulder Pain (NSP) disorders are the newlinecommon musculoskeletal conditions seen in adult. MTrPs are one of the primary newlinecausative factors for the development of pain associated functional disabilities in newlinea variety of NSP disorders. Conventional physical therapies and pharmacological newlineinterventions less effective in the deactivation process of trigger points. TrP-DN newlineconsidered being an effective intervention to deactivate the MTrPs, but it has newlineinconsistent shreds of evidence. IMES has been used less commonly for the newlinemanagement of MPS in NSP disorders and specific electrode placement with newlinescientific background was not used in MPS management. newlineStudy design and Aim: A parallel group, assessor blinded, superiority newlinerandomized clinical trial to compare the effects of TrP-DN and IMES using IEP in newlineorder to find-out the superior effect of IMES in individuals with NSP disorders. newlineOutcome measures: Primary outcome measures are shoulder pain and newlineupper limb disability, and secondary outcome measures are kinesiophobia, newlinenumber of MTrPs and shoulder ROM. newlineMethodology: 230 subjects were allocated in two groups randomly using newlineconcealment method. 115 subjects in Group-I treated with 10-15 minutes of TrPDN, newlinetwice a week for three consecutive weeks. Group-II consists of 115 subjects newlinetreated with 10-15 minutes of IMES using IEP method, twice a week for three newlineconsecutive weeks. Further, both groups participants were treated with newlineCodman s pendular exercises for 5 minutes. Both primary outcome measures newlineand shoulder ROM were assessed at baseline and post-intervention (week-1, newlinexiii newlineweek-2, week-3) and follow-up period (month-3 and month-6). Kinesiophobia newlinewas assessed at baseline and month-6, and the number of MTrPs was assessed newlineat baseline, post-intervention (week-3) and follow-up period (month-6). Within newlineand between groups differences were analyzed by parametric tests such as RMANOVA newlineand independent- t test. newlineResults: Data measured at baseline was homogeneous. Of the 230, 11 newlinesubjects discontinued week-1 post-intervention
Pagination: 
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/237226
Appears in Departments:Department of Physiotherapy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_tiltle.pdf.pdfAttached File150.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_ certificate.pdf.pdf80.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_declaration.pdf.pdf169.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_acknowledgement.pdf.pdf186.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_abstract.pdf.pdf185.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_content.pdf.pdf163.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_ introduction.pdf.pdf663.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_methodology.pdf.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_results.pdf.pdf872.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_discussion.pdf.pdf756.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_conclusion. pdf.pdf309.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12.references.pdf.pdf514.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_ annexture.pdf.pdf4.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: