Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/2315
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-23T05:22:57Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-23T05:22:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08-23-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/2315-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to design a controlled delivery system of Irinotecan using PEGylated liposomes to overcome the limitations of conventional i.v. formulation therapy and to investigate its in vivo performance for sustained delivery and possibility of improved safety. This was achieved by critical evaluation of the developed formulation, selective bioanalytical method, pharmacokinetic and toxicity evaluation. PEGylated liposomes of Irinotecan were prepared by the lipid film hydration method. The loading efficiency of the liposome was found to be greater than 72%. The in vitro release of Irinotecan from PEGylated liposome formulations was in a sustained manner and about 80% of the drug was released in 120 hours. The developed liposome was found to be stable at 4°C for three months. Following intravenous administration to Wistar rats, the liposomal formulation showed effective plasma concentration for 96 hrs compared to 12-16 hrs shown by conventional i.v. formulation. Mean Cmax value of liposome formulation was significantly less (354.798±85.330 ng/mL for Irinotecan and 34.266±3.975 for SN-38) than conventional i.v. formulation (1829.616±143.918 ng/mL for Irinotecan and 96.340±10.879for SN-38). The AUC0-t of the liposome formulation was 3-4 fold higher compared with i.v. formulation. The increase in AUC and decrease in Cmax reflects that the liposome formulation of Irinotecan could reduce the toxic complications and limitations of conventional i.v. formulation. Terminal elimination half life of liposomal Irinotecan is higher than Irinotecan i.v. formulation further supporting the hypothesis that liposomal formulation significantly alters the disposition of Irinotecan. The volumes of distribution for Irinotecan and SN-38 were lower for liposome formulation as compared to conventional i.v. formulation. The clearance rate of Irinotecan and SN-38 in circulation is 4-6 times higher for i.v. formulation as compared to liposomal formulation. These results indicate that required concentration of SN-38 is available in the circulation for a longer period of time. In addition to these observations, differences in pharmacokinetic variables between the formulations are correlated to toxicity findings during toxicokinetic evaluation and organ toxicity study.en_US
dc.format.extent166p.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.rightsuniversityen_US
dc.titleLiposome formulation of anticancer drug and its pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetic evaluationen_US
dc.creator.researcherShetty, Raghavendraen_US
dc.subject.keywordPharmacyen_US
dc.subject.keywordLiposomeen_US
dc.subject.keywordPharmacokineticsen_US
dc.subject.keywordToxicokineticen_US
dc.subject.keywordAnticancer drugen_US
dc.description.noteReferences p. 135-146, Appendix p.147-166en_US
dc.contributor.guideGajjar, Anuradha Ken_US
dc.contributor.guideKumar, Vimalen_US
dc.publisher.placeAhmedabaden_US
dc.publisher.universityNirma Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionInstitute of Pharmacyen_US
dc.date.registered0en_US
dc.date.completed2010en_US
dc.date.awarded2010en_US
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNoneen_US
dc.type.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.source.inflibnetINFLIBNETen_US
Appears in Departments:Institute of Pharmacy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File33.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf50.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_declaration.pdf39.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_dedication.pdf51.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_acknowledgement.pdf77.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_abstract.pdf15.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_list of abbreviations.pdf118.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_list of tables.pdf55.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_list of figures.pdf57.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_tables of contents.pdf18.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 1.pdf252.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 2.pdf68.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 3.pdf247.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 4.pdf171.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 5.pdf2.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_chapter 6.pdf62.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_chapter 7.pdf65.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_chapter 8.pdf87.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
19_chapter 9.pdf623.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: