Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/17775
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatialTextileen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-16T05:17:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-16T05:17:46Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-16-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/17775-
dc.description.abstractIn the present research work, as one of the objectives, design and development of a test equipment for the evaluation of pesticide protection performance of fabrics, which permits entry of pesticides following penetration mechanism, was considered. The need for the development of such equipment had become essential since the currently used standard methods of ISO, ASTM and EN or certain attempts taken by the researchers towards slightly modifying the approach used in the standard methods do not reflect the conditions prevailing in the field when pesticide applicators carry out their spraying activity. In all the above methods, either direct contact of a pesticide in bulk quantity or as a spray is made use of, in carrying out the test. When these methods are employed, it would result in, under evaluation of fabric performance and end up with prescribing fabrics beyond what is required for the situation, leading to pesticide applicators complaining discomfort while using them. Pesticide applicators never come across direct contact with pesticide in the manner as stated above, during their spraying activity. If we consider the pesticide liquor that is let out of the sprayer, bulk of it falls directly on the plant/ground and the rest remain in the air. Hence, during the spraying activity, the applicator will come in contact with pesticide borne in the air alone. Pesticide applicators take all possible efforts by way of selecting the right spraying equipment, using optimum composition of pesticide liquor, performing the spraying activity when right meteorological conditions prevail (temperature between 20°- 30°C, relative humidity above 45% and air velocity between 3-7km/h) and following the best practice of spraying (i.e., to start spraying from near the downwind edge of the field and proceed in the upwind direction) to keep the pesticide borne in the air at a minimum concentration level.en_US
dc.format.extentxviii, 182p.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relation187en_US
dc.rightsuniversityen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of test equipment for evaluation of pesticide protection performance and investigations on cotton fabricsen_US
dc.creator.researcherAbirami Ren_US
dc.subject.keywordASTMen_US
dc.subject.keywordFabricsen_US
dc.subject.keywordPenetration mechanismen_US
dc.subject.keywordPesticideen_US
dc.subject.keywordRelative humidityen_US
dc.description.noteReferencesen_US
dc.contributor.guideSelvakumar Nen_US
dc.publisher.placeChennaien_US
dc.publisher.universityAnna Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionFaculty of Science and Humanitiesen_US
dc.date.registeredn.d.en_US
dc.date.completed2013en_US
dc.date.awarded2013en_US
dc.format.dimensions28cmen_US
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNoneen_US
dc.source.universityUniversityen_US
dc.type.degreePh.D.en_US
Appears in Departments:Faculty of Science and Humanities

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File79.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf844.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_abstract.pdf70.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_acknowledgement.pdf65.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_content.pdf97.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_chapter1.pdf114.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_chapter2.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter3pdf.pdf1.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter4.pdf316.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter5.pdf608.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter6.pdf94.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_references.pdf152.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_publications.pdf53.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_vitae.pdf57.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: