Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/10018
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatialLiver diseasesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-19T11:01:32Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-19T11:01:32Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-19-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/10018-
dc.description.abstractRenal function is an important indicator of the state of health of kidney. The impairment in renal function of varying severity, is common in patients with liver diseases. It has significant impact on the outcome of liver disease. The overall, prevalence of renal dysfunction in various subgroups of liver disease namely hepatitis, cirrhosis and advanced liver disease associated with ascites and edema, is mostly unknown. The renal dysfunction can lead to increased morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from liver diseases. AIM:The overall aim of the present study was to assess renal function in patients suffering from liver diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospective, observational, case-control study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Delhi Heart Institute and Research Centre, at Bathinda (PB.), during the period from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2012. newlineStudy sample consisted of total 200 participants, comprised of 100 patients and another 100 healthy controls. The patients were stratified, proportionately into Group 1 (n=33) viral hepatitis, Group 2 (n=30) non ascites cirrhosis, Group 3 (n=37) cirrhosis with ascites.The independent variables were Serum Bilirubin, Albumin, SGPT, SGOT, INR, Haemoglobin.The dependant variables assessed, included, eGFR, BUN, BUN/CRT, Serum Creatinine, Serum Sodium and Potassium. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1. Mean age of 100 patients (45.7± 12.7y), differed (Z = 0.27), from mean age of 100 controls (46.27 ±13y), non significantly (p = 0.78). newline2. Glomerular filtration rate: Mean GFR of (107.7± 19.7), (96.4± 16.1), (44.1± 14.9) and (108.78 ±18.39) ml/min/1.73mm2 were found in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. One way Anova test showed, difference in mean eGFR in four Groups, F (3,196) =127.9, (p=lt0.001), highly significant. Renal dysfunction was found in 56% (37) patients of ascites cirrhosis in Group 3, out of total 67 patients of cirrhosis, (cirrhosis patients in both Group 2en_US
dc.format.extent116p.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.rightsuniversityen_US
dc.titleAssessing renal function in patients suffering from liver diseasesen_US
dc.creator.researcherGupta, Anil Kumaren_US
dc.subject.keywordBiochemistryen_US
dc.description.noteSummary p. 99-102, References p. 104-116en_US
dc.contributor.guideSingh Sidhu, Rupinderen_US
dc.publisher.placeJhunjhunuen_US
dc.publisher.universityShri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibarewala Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionFaculty of Sciencesen_US
dc.date.registered10/1/2010en_US
dc.date.completed14/3/2012en_US
dc.date.awarded27/1/2013en_US
dc.format.dimensions--en_US
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNoneen_US
dc.source.universityUniversityen_US
dc.type.degreePh.D.en_US
Appears in Departments:Faculty of Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File101.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_declaration.pdf20.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_certificate.pdf20.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_acknowledgement.pdf19.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_index.pdf15.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_ list of figures.pdf17.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_list of tables.pdf21.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_list of graphs.pdf17.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_abbrevations.pdf24.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_abstract.pdf20.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 1.pdf49.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 2.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 3.pdf57.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 4.pdf226.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 5.pdf59.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_chapter 6.pdf31.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_references.pdf48.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are licensed under Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Altmetric Badge: