Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/8430
Title: Comparative study of blind source separation algorithms for harmonic source identification in power system networks
Researcher: Supriya, P
Guide(s): Padmanabhan Nambiar, T N
Keywords: Engineering
algorithms
power system networks
Electrical and Electronics Engineerin
Upload Date: 29-Apr-2013
University: Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (University)
Completed Date: February 2013
Abstract: Wide use of non linear loads in electric power systems results in the generation and propagation of current and voltage harmonics in the network which pollutes the entire power system. The harmonics generated by the harmonic sources need to be properly identified and estimated. Such a step will allow the harmonic perpetrators to be penalised and encourages the installation of dynamic filters at suitable locations for the compensation of harmonics. Various techniques are discussed in literature for the identification and estimation of harmonics that exist in power system network; these are mainly classified as single point and multipoint measurements. The methods based on neural networks, Kalman Filter and the like require apriori knowledge of the power system network topology. But, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is a blind signal processing technique used for harmonic source identification and estimation which is independent of the topology of the power system network. In this research work, four different time structured ICA algorithms are evaluated for harmonic voltage and current estimation. The algorithms employed are Fast ICA (FICA), Efficient Variant Fast ICA (EFICA), Entropy Bound Minimisation (EBM) and Joint Approximate Diagonalisation of Eigen Matrices (JADE) ICA. A four bus system and an IEEE 14 bus system with non linear loads like Static Var Compensator, High Voltage Direct Current Transmission, Adjustable Speed Drives, Pulse Width Modulated Inverter and Electric Arc Furnace are considered to examine the competence of all the four algorithms. For comparison of the effectiveness of these algorithms figure of merit in terms of four error parameters namely maximum absolute error (MAE), absolute mean error (AME), mean square error (MSE) and average absolute percentage error (AAPE) are formulated. The error in harmonic estimation using the four algorithms is inconsistent and is dependent on the probability distribution of the known voltage and current values.
Pagination: 150p.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/8430
Appears in Departments:Amrita School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File48.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate.pdf143.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_declaration.pdf112.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_dedication.pdf29.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_contents.pdf105.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_acknowledgements.pdf91.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_abstract.pdf158.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_list of figures.pdf119.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_list of tables.pdf170.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_list of abbreviations.pdf100.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_list of symbols.pdf476.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_synopsis.pdf418.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 1.pdf99.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 2.pdf218.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 3.pdf407.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_chapter 4.pdf891.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_chapter 5.pdf158.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_chapter 6.pdf453.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
19_chapter 7.pdf99.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
20_references.pdf266.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
21_appendix.pdf1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
22_tables.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: