Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/4241
Title: Democratic decentralisation and participatory natural resources management: a study of Amangal Mandal in Mahabubnagar District of Andhra Pradesh
Researcher: Srinivas, S
Guide(s): Jairath, Vinod K
Keywords: Natural Resources Management
Telangana struggle of 1969
Panchayat Raj
Joint Forest Management
Watershed management
Sociology
Upload Date: 16-Aug-2012
University: University of Hyderabad
Completed Date: December 2009
Abstract: One of the most popular state reforms that have opened ?spaces? for a wider and deeper participation of citizens at the local level has been the decentralisation process. Democratic Decentralisation is the transfer of resources and power to lower level authorities which are largely or wholly independent of higher levels of government and which are democratic. In India, certain cases of Democratic decentralisation have achieved both greater participation of marginal groups and social justice like in the left ruled states of West Bengal and Kerala. In both cases, decentralisation has been credited with ensuring the participation of subordinate groups ? such as women, landless groups, sharecroppers and small peasants ? and being directly linked to the pursuit of redistributive policies that have had pro-poor outcomes. Decentralised natural resources management has assumed importance as a development strategy, because of the claims that it can contribute towards sustainable livelihoods. Almost all the developing countries have initiated the process of decentralisation and India is one such country that was involved in this process for a long time. The introduction of development programmes with people?s participation as the core theme is an indication of the progress of this process. Particularly, in the programmes like Watershed Management, Water Users Associations, and Joint Forest Management this becomes evident. Generally, the discussions on local self-governance or democratic decentralization and participatory natural resource management do not intersect and take place in somewhat independent domains. Baumann (1998; 2000) had also emphasized the need to bring the two domains together. It is argued that it is essential to discuss democratic decentralization and participatory natural resource management together because one cannot be understood or newlineachieved without the understanding or achievement of the other...
Pagination: 215p.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/4241
Appears in Departments:School of Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File43.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_declaration.pdf29.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_certificate.pdf122.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_dedication.pdf62.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_abstract.pdf103.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_acknowledgements.pdf151.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_contents.pdf101.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_abbreviations.pdf56.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_list of tables.pdf92.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 1.pdf191.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 2.pdf253.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 3.pdf280.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_chapter 4.pdf504.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
14_chapter 5.pdf347.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
15_chapter 6.pdf318.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
16_chapter 7.pdf210.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
17_chapter 8.pdf135.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
18_references.pdf147.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
19_annexture.pdf616.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.