Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/10106
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatialCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-26T05:50:59Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-26T05:50:59Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/10106-
dc.description.abstractIn the last few decades earthquakes have struck different parts of the world. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated that most of the reinforced concrete structures specially the beam-column joints are vulnerable during earthquakes. The basic requirement of design is that the joint must be stronger than the adjoining hinging members, usually the beams or columns. The existing reinforced concrete beam-column joints which are designed as per code IS 456:2000 do not meet the requirements given in the ductility code IS 13920:1993. Hence the beam-column joints that are not designed as per the ductility code may not perform well when subjected to seismic forces. They must be strengthened in order to improve there performance during earthquakes. Until 1990, concrete jacketing and steel jacketing were the two common methods adopted for strengthening the deficient reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Concrete jacketing increases the cross sectional area and self-weight of the structure. Steel jackets are poor in resisting weather attacks. Both methods are labour intensive and difficult to implement at the site. A new technique for strengthening the reinforced concrete structural members is through confinement with an external fiber reinforced polymer sheets. The effectiveness of the strengthening has to be evaluated experimentally. An attempt has been made to carryout an experimental investigation to compare the performance of beam-column joints that are designed as per code IS 456:2000 with that of beam-column joints detailed as per the code IS 13920:1993 for various grade of concrete and various axial loads on column to find out the deficiencies of the joints detailed as per code IS 456:2000. An experimental investigation has been carried out under static load and reversal load to find the load carrying capacity and energy absorption capacity of reinforced concrete beam-column joint specimens that are detailed as per code IS 456:2000 and retrofitted with various fiber reinforced polymer sheets such as glass fiber ....en_US
dc.format.extent251p.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relationNo. of references 27en_US
dc.rightsuniversityen_US
dc.titleStudies on the behavior of retrofitted RCC beam column jointsen_US
dc.title.alternativeen_US
dc.creator.researcherRobert Ravi Sen_US
dc.subject.keywordCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.keywordRCC beamen_US
dc.description.noteReferences p. 247-249 and List of publications p. 250-251en_US
dc.contributor.guidePrince Arulraj Gen_US
dc.publisher.placeCoimbatoreen_US
dc.publisher.universityKarunya Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.date.registeredn.d.en_US
dc.date.completedAugust, 2010en_US
dc.date.awarded2011en_US
dc.format.dimensions--en_US
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNoneen_US
dc.type.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.source.inflibnetINFLIBNETen_US
Appears in Departments:Department of Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01_title.pdfAttached File123.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02_certificate & declarations.pdf104.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03_acknowledgements.pdf72.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04_abstract.pdf22.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
05_table of contents.pdf583.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
06_list of tables & figures.pdf207.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
07_chapter 1.pdf289.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
08_chapter 2.pdf113.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
09_chapter 3.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
10_chapter 4.pdf3.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
11_chapter 5.pdf2.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
12_chapter 6.pdf38.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13_references & list of publications.pdf7.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Shodhganga are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetric Badge: